Print this page Email this page Users Online: 800 | Click here to view old website
Home About us Editorial Board Search Current Issue Archives Submit Article Author Instructions Contact Us Login 
ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 292-302

Core Curriculum and Special Study Modules at the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak


Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia

Correspondence Address:
Alam Sher Malik
Professor and Head of the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Lot 77, KTLD Section 22, Jalan Tun Ahmad Zaidi Adruce, 93150 Kuching, Sarawak
Malaysia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Introduction: The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (FMHS), follows a problem-based learning, integrated and community-based curriculum which reflects the specific needs of doctors working in Sarawak. Using paediatrics as an example, this paper describes the process of development of core content (knowledge, procedural and communication skills, attitudes), additional knowledge and special study modules at the FMHS. Objectives: In 2003, the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health conducted a workshop to evaluate and update its 5-year-old curriculum. Methods: The wise-men approach was adopted. Local and guest academicians (including members of the Department of Community Medicine and Basic Health Sciences), consultants, registrar, house officer and nursing staff of the Paediatric Department of Sarawak General Hospital (SGH), paediatric nursing lecturer and members of Medical Education Unit were involved. The review was based on three approaches: Problem/Task-based learning; Spiral curriculum; Outcome-based education. Results: Core content and additional knowledge topics were modified. The special study modules were retained, but their duration was reduced. It was recommended that the curriculum should be reviewed at regular intervals. Discussion: To select the core content and additional knowledge topics, clear and specific criteria were developed. Some topics were dropped, others were added, and some were moved from core to the additional knowledge section. Conclusion: It was a rewarding activity. The reviewed curriculum was received well by both the students and faculty. The enthusiasm and cooperation extended, especially by the faculty at SGH in the implementation of this curriculum, was remarkable.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed386    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded104    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal