Print this page Email this page Users Online: 497 | Click here to view old website
Home About us Editorial Board Search Current Issue Archives Submit Article Author Instructions Contact Us Login 
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Year : 2000  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 231-235

Students' Evaluation of a Traditional and an Innovative Family Medicine Course in Saudi Arabia


Associate Professor and Consultant of Family Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


This study compares students' evaluation of a traditional and an innovative undergraduate family medicine (FM) courses. The old curriculum was traditional and teacher-centered. Changes in-line with the innovative learning concepts were introduced. While innovative course (IC) students had signi. cant improvement in both their attitude towards innovative learning methods and self-assessment of knowledge, traditional course students had improvement only in self-assessment of knowledge. Students in both courses did not show post-cycle improvement in perception of their own skills and were dissatis. ed with the Health Center (HC) tutors' training. The need to recruit trained family physicians at the af. liated HC became evident. IC students valued the exercise of adding their generated learning needs as part of the curriculum. Other lessons learned were presented. We hope that . ndings of this study would encourage medical colleges in the region to critically review their FM courses.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed322    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded73    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal